Startup Opportunities In AI – The Unbundling Of Search

Startup Opportunities In AI – The Unbundling Of Search

Startup Opportunities In AI – The Unbundling Of Search

Every great technology wave has a paradigm, a very broad and deep movement that is only barely perceptible in its infancy. This paradigm typically blossoms into many forms over years, even decades, to come.

The entire internet technology wave, for example, was a communications paradigm rooted in sending messages. Decades ago, mundane email enabled virtually instantaneous communication around the world. And the thirty years of consumer internet thus far have represented the generalization of that paradigm. At a very high level, the internet itself can be thought of as a user sending “emails” to a server and the server sending response “emails” in the form of a webpage. Even Zoom video conversations can be thought of as sending thousands of email packets (of images and sound) between people (but, of course, with different protocols, etc).

We are now in the midst of another major technology wave, the artificial intelligence wave. The first major paradigm of that wave is search and the use of computation to sift through and understand massive amounts of data.

In the early consumer internet, before Google, navigating the web meant navigating through a series of human “computations.” At that time, Yahoo! (which stands for “yet another hierarchical officious oracle”) was the default way to access the internet’s information, and the product relied on thousands of humans using human judgement to group pages into buckets, like “Arts,” “Business and Economy,” “Computers and Internet,” and so on.

In 1996, Larry and Sergey took a different approach at Google. Rather than relying on humans to make millions of decisions for a manual hierarchy, they trained their computers to “rank” web pages using their Page Rank Algorithm. This effort was based on the prescient insight that the importance of a page could be approximated by the links pointing to the page.

Google successfully translated millions of human decisions into billions of computer computations. And while it wasn’t apparent then, this technology elevated search to the position of “the killer app” of the first twenty-years of the AI revolution. (Though we may no longer consider search to be artificial intelligence.)

As mentioned, the manifestations of technological paradigms become clear over time as they shift into new forms. Email shifted over time. Its basic value, instantaneous communication, was unbundled into messaging apps and social networks. Purchases that once were made over email are now made through companies like Amazon, Facebook, Google, Apple. All of this represents the flowering of the email paradigm.

Similarly, search is unbundling in the AI revolution and we’re seeing a shift in search’s user interface and the emergence of dedicated search vertical:

Interface

The user interface of search is changing. First, and most obviously, the voice paradigm is changing how we can search. For years now we have talked with Siri, Alexa and Google Assistant. What hasn’t been achieved yet is a really incredible application of all that technology. Sure, Alexa has started recommending products to me – but I haven’t bought any of them. The technology isn’t yet at the point where it clearly has a business case. If and when the business case is ultimately crystalized, however, the tech giants will likely lead here.

Second, we have seen visual search, the ability to make a query where the input itself is an image. This can be particularly relevant for online shopping . It will likely not be massive until AR happens in a big way. The giants would also be at an advantage here.

Third, we have disruptors to the classic search business model of Google and Bing. Companies including DuckDuckGo, Neeva and You.com are pioneering ad-free search. The interface in these disruptors is similar- but doesn’t need any screen “real estate” for advertising (because they do not monetize with ads).

The Unbundling of Search’s Verticals

The other big change in the unbundling of search is the emergence of more-specific kinds of search, often by industry or product. A fundamental reason for this is that the search process often involves digging through successive levels of linked information with greater and greater specificity.

Think about your own search journey: it proceeds in stages. When you look to buy a TV, you likely start on Google. You may start with “Best TVs” and read a couple of blogs. Then you get some more details and you wonder “what is 4k vs 8k vs Ultra HD.” Then you may go back and search for the “best 70-inch 4k TV.” This is called an “upper funnel” search, and it goes on for a while.

The next stage is likely to be making the purchase. At this point, you may have your preferred TV brand. You now search again in what’s called a “lower funnel” search application, which includes Amazon, BestBuy.com, etc, for the specific TV. This example represents a two-stage search funnel, but many funnels have more stages. Amazon has proven to be exceptionally effective at product search.

There is a lot of opportunity in search, especially in the lower stages of the funnel. Lower funnel search examples include:

Travel: This is one of the oldest search verticals and it supports huge companies, in part because these companies have been able to own the full purchase (top to bottom). Booking, even during the pandemic, supports an $90-billion market cap, while Expedia is worth over $20 billion.

eCommerce: Amazon has really captured a lot of value in this area. Amazon has exceptionally performant search at the core of what it does – just on a limited (but still massive) number of products. More and more of the buying decision is being made on Amazon alone. This supports a $1.5 trillion company.

Function-Specific Search: Every function can benefit from tailored search product. One function that finds search particularly valuable is software developers. General questions about coding, specific bugs and general code repositories may begin on Google, but they often end up in specific code bases. Companies like Sourcegraph are bringing tools to search code in a much more specific fashion.

These examples are just the beginning. The opportunities will continue to abound. From a technical perspective, in order for search to be valuable there need to be three characteristics in place: a lot of information to sift through; value in getting to the right piece of information; and some way to quantify what is “right” in the search result.

Anyone building a search business should think about that business using a simple tripartite framework. First, can you really help with some decision through search in a way that is above-and-beyond existing modes? Second, is that decision likely to be valuable to some group of users? And finally, are there enough users facing that decision to make for a sufficiently large market?

This article originally appeared on forbes.com To read the full article and see the images, click here.

Nastel Technologies helps companies achieve flawless delivery of digital services powered by middleware. Nastel delivers Middleware Management, Monitoring, Tracking and Analytics to detect anomalies, accelerate decisions, and enable customers to constantly innovate. To answer business-centric questions and provide actionable guidance for decision-makers, Nastel’s Navigator X fuses:

  • Advanced predictive anomaly detection, Bayesian Classification and other machine learning algorithms
  • Raw information handling and analytics speed
  • End-to-end business transaction tracking that spans technologies, tiers, and organizations
  • Intuitive, easy-to-use data visualizations and dashboards

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *